The foundational case for judicial review in the U.S. is often viewed as...

The foundational case for judicial review in the U.S. is often viewed as...

• A. U.S. v. Holmes
• B. The Marshall Constitution
• C. Marbury v. Madison
• D. The Judiciary Act of 1789

Answer: (C)

The foundational case for judicial review in the U.S. is widely recognized as Marbury v. Madison. This landmark Supreme Court case, decided in 1803, established the principle that the courts have the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether they are constitutional. This function, known as judicial review, allows the judiciary to invalidate laws and executive actions that contradict the Constitution. Marbury v. Madison arose from a political conflict in which William Marbury, appointed as a justice of the peace, sought to compel Secretary of State James Madison to deliver his commission. Chief Justice John Marshall used this case to assert the power of the judiciary, stating that it is the duty of the judiciary to say what the law is. This principle is foundational to the balance of powers among the branches of government and has had a profound influence on American jurisprudence. Other options, while historically significant, do not encapsulate the establishment of judicial review in the same way. For example, U.S. v. Holmes pertains to specific legal matters of that case but does not address the overarching principle of judicial review. The term "Marshall Constitution" is not a recognized legal term and does not refer to a specific case. Additionally, the Judiciary Act of 1789 created the

The foundational case for judicial review in the U.S. is widely recognized as Marbury v. Madison. This landmark Supreme Court case, decided in 1803, established the principle that the courts have the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether they are constitutional. This function, known as judicial review, allows the judiciary to invalidate laws and executive actions that contradict the Constitution.

Marbury v. Madison arose from a political conflict in which William Marbury, appointed as a justice of the peace, sought to compel Secretary of State James Madison to deliver his commission. Chief Justice John Marshall used this case to assert the power of the judiciary, stating that it is the duty of the judiciary to say what the law is. This principle is foundational to the balance of powers among the branches of government and has had a profound influence on American jurisprudence.

Other options, while historically significant, do not encapsulate the establishment of judicial review in the same way. For example, U.S. v. Holmes pertains to specific legal matters of that case but does not address the overarching principle of judicial review. The term "Marshall Constitution" is not a recognized legal term and does not refer to a specific case. Additionally, the Judiciary Act of 1789 created the